Exam III Review Sheet
for
Knowledge and Reality

Philosophy 120

Format: The exam will consist of two parts: short answer and long answer. There will be 6-8 short answer questions of which you pick 4-5. Answers should be anywhere from one to five sentences. There will be 3-5 long answer questions, of which you pick 2. Answers should be about 2 blue-book pages, front and back. The exam is scheduled for Friday, December 18 at our regular class place, from 11-9am. There will be a brief review in class on the last day of class, and on the discussion forum, if you choose to use it.

Some Terms

Deductive Arguments
Valid/Invalid
Sound
Inductive Arguments
Strong/Weak
Cogent
Possible Worlds
A Priori
A Posteriori
Leibniz's Law
Transitivity of Identity

Weirob's Challenge
The Soul View
Dualism
Materialism
Intensional Fallacy
Person Stages/Temporal Parts
Memory View of Personal Identity
Body View of Personal Identity (Weirob's position)
Eliminativism
Sorites Arguments
One Bit No Diff Principle

Perdurantism
Endurantism
Eternalism
Presentism
Tree and the Cellulose
Statue and the Clay
Wiggins' Principle S and S*
Body/Body Minus
DAUP



Principles, Arguments, and Objections

Arguments against Dualism: elusiveness of spirit, correlation of minds and bodies, location of spirits, continuity of nature (evolution and individual growth)
Arguments for Dualism: from semantic properties, aesthetic properties, modal properties, from location, ineffability of qualia, possibility of ghosts and zombies, argument from free will, Descartes' knowledge argument
Body Translplant Case (for Memory View of Personal Identity)
Fission (or Duplication) Case (against Brain Identity and Memroy View)
Intransitivity of Memory Objection to Memory View
Hume on Personal Identity (what is his view and why (arguemnt)?)
Unger's Sorites Argument for Eliminativism about persons (i.e., that he does not exist)
The Puzzle of Change
Options in Response to the Puzzle of Change
Perdurantist's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Endurantist's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Why Hinchliff thinks that neither the Perdurantist and Endurantist solve the Puzzle
Hinchliff's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Wiggins' solution to the Tree and the Cellulose
van Inwagen's Argument against DAUP




Page Last Updated: Dec. 7, 2009
Back to Phil 120 Page
Back to Meg's Main Page