Exam III Review Sheet
for
Knowledge
and Reality
Philosophy 120
Format: The exam
will consist of two parts: short answer
and long answer. There will be 6-8 short answer questions of which you
pick
4-5. Answers should be anywhere from one to five sentences. There will
be
3-5 long answer questions, of which you pick 2. Answers should be about
2
blue-book
pages, front and back. The exam is scheduled for Friday, December 18 at
our regular class place, from 11-9am. There will be
a brief
review in class on the last day of class, and on the discussion forum,
if you
choose to use it.
Some Terms
Deductive Arguments
Valid/Invalid
Sound
Inductive
Arguments
Strong/Weak
Cogent
Possible Worlds
A Priori
A Posteriori
Leibniz's
Law
Transitivity of Identity
Weirob's Challenge
The Soul View
Dualism
Materialism
Intensional Fallacy
Person Stages/Temporal Parts
Memory View of Personal
Identity
Body View of Personal Identity (Weirob's position)
Eliminativism
Sorites Arguments
One Bit No Diff Principle
Perdurantism
Endurantism
Eternalism
Presentism
Tree
and the Cellulose
Statue and
the Clay
Wiggins' Principle S and S*
Body/Body Minus
DAUP
Principles, Arguments, and
Objections
Arguments against
Dualism: elusiveness of spirit, correlation of minds
and bodies, location of spirits, continuity of nature (evolution and
individual growth)
Arguments for Dualism: from semantic properties, aesthetic properties,
modal properties, from location, ineffability of qualia, possibility of
ghosts and zombies, argument from free will, Descartes' knowledge
argument
Body Translplant Case (for Memory
View of Personal Identity)
Fission (or Duplication) Case (against
Brain Identity and Memroy View)
Intransitivity of Memory Objection to Memory View
Hume on Personal Identity (what is his view and why (arguemnt)?)
Unger's Sorites
Argument for Eliminativism about persons (i.e., that he does not exist)
The Puzzle
of Change
Options in Response to the Puzzle of Change
Perdurantist's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Endurantist's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Why Hinchliff thinks that neither the Perdurantist and Endurantist
solve the Puzzle
Hinchliff's Response to the Puzzle of Change
Wiggins' solution to the Tree and the Cellulose
van Inwagen's Argument against DAUP
Page Last Updated: Dec. 7, 2009