Syllabus
Philosophy 330: Metaphysics

Puzzles of Objects and Persons

Syllabus

Office: Caldwell 206B
Office Phone: 919-926-3330
Office Hours:  TR 4-5pm and by appointment.

Email: megw@email.unc.edu
Course Webpage: http://www.unc.edu/~megw/Phil330S08
Where: Saunders 220
When: TR 5-6:15pm

Required Texts

Material Constitution: A Reader, edited by Michael Rea
A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, by John Perry
The Metaphysics of Death, by John Martin Fischer

The above texts should be available in the student book store. Other required readings--if there should be any--will become available during the duration of the course, and will be posted up on my website. In general, I will email the entire class when any changes have been made to any of the course related webpages. Suggested on-line readings will be posted on the course main page here.

Course Description


Suppose you have finally decided to marry the love of your life. The two of you exchange vows and promise to be together forever. However, seven years later you come home and find the closets empty of your spouse's belongings, some suitcases missing, and the following note propped up on the bedroom bureau:

“As we both know, human beings are made up of a collection of skin and bones and tissue and veins and millions and millions of atoms and particles. When we made our marriage vows, there were two distinct collections of particles exchanging vows. However, over the last seven years, those particles have changed: bits of tissue and skin have been replaced by new bits of tissue and skin. In fact, there is not a single particle that makes up me now that is identical with any of the particles that made up the collection of particles that made a promise to you at the alter. Therefore, since the particles that make up me now are entirely distinct from the ones that married you, I am a different human being from the one who married you. Since we are not married, I am out of here. Good-bye.” (example modified from Michael Rea's in the Introduction to Material Constitution: A Reader)

Understandably, you are heartbroken. But, more importantly, you are feeling duped. Surely something must be wrong with the above line of reasoning (otherwise divorce proceedings would be a much swifter process and there would be no need for expensive divorce lawyers). But where did your spouse's reasoning go awry? 
In this class, we will be looking at puzzles of constitution like the one above. We will be primarily focused on the nature of objects and persons, leading us to discuss such topics in metaphysics as identity, persistence, time, composition, and the mind/body problem. In addition to puzzles like the one above, we will also be interested in related puzzles involving persons and death motivated by questions such as: Are persons identical to their bodies? To their brains? To their souls? Is memory important for personal identity? What happens when we die? Is death a bad thing for the person who is dead? Does death give life meaning? If so, is a life without death meaningless? Is immortality desirable or undesirable? Should we fear death? 

This course will be divided into three main sections: (i) Puzzles of Objects, (ii) Puzzles of Persons, and (iii) Puzzles of Death. Please visit the reading schedule here for more details on the particular readings and topics we will be covering throughout the course. 



Course Requirements

(i) 2 Papers 

There will be 2 papers 4-6 pages in length. Due dates for the papers can be found on the reading schedule. Rough drafts for the papers, while not required, are strongly encouraged. I will be holding extra office hours the week the papers are due so that we can go over the rough drafts in person.

(ii) 1 Final

There will be 1 comprehensive final at the end of the semester. It will cover all of the material and will be in short answer/essay format. Date: Tuesday, April 29 4pm.

(iii) Participation

You are expected to read the assignments, think carefully about the readings, and come to class prepared. Part of what makes philosophy so engaging is being able to discuss various views with others. My hope is that this course will provide you with a forum where such discussion can take place. Thus, a small part of your grade will be allotted for participation, which includes coming to class, taking part in class discussions, turning in class assignments, coming to office hours, etc.

Grades

Your final grade in this course will be broken down as follows:

First Paper                    30%
Second Paper               30%
Final                             30%
Participation                   10%


Caveat: You must pass the final exam, and you must turn in all of the required assignments, in order to pass the class.

Honor Code

It is expected that everyone in the class has read, understood, and obeys UNC's Honor Code, which you can read on-line here. For more general information about the university's honor system, go here.

General Advice

Philosophy is oftentimes difficult. You may find that you need to read an article several times before you even have a sense of what the article is about. Please don't get frustrated—you’ll discover that having patience and working through such arduous material will be incredibly rewarding. However, chances are that even reading and re-reading the material will not be enough. That is why I encourage every single one of you to see me in my office hours whenever you feel you need the extra help. I have two hours a week specifically allotted for meeting with students, but feel free to make an appointment with me if another time would be more convenient. Also, I am open to having group meetings or study sessions outside of class time whenever you feel such a meeting would be beneficial.


Page Last Updated: Jan. 10, 2008
Back to Phil 330 Page
Back to Meg's Teaching Page
Back to Meg's Main Page