You
are expected to do the reading, and to complete it in a timely manner
(i.e., prior to the meeting of the class). There is a substantial reading
load and so I strongly recommend that you form into 3-4 person reading-groups.
You are welcome and encouraged to split up the reading within the group
as long as each reader has an opportunity to report back to the group
of the material that he/she has read.
Museum
Visits
Museum
visits are planned around most weekly assignments. We will discuss at
the first class how we will schedule off-campus visits. It is possible
that not everyone will be able to visit every site, but the expectation
is that you will make most of the visits. (I will help you understand
what "most" means during our first class.) Museum visits and information
related to the visits will be posted under the "Announcements" section
of Blackboard.
Requirements
and Grading
(1) Weekly Assignments:
Four students
will be in charge of each class session. Two of the four will
write a short (3-5 page) paper suggesting some basic analytic and/or
historiographic issues raised in that week's readings. I will provide
some guidance for these papers in terms of the questions to be asked.
These two are responsible for posting the papers to the “Blackboard”
system by the Tuesday afternoon (no later than 6:00 PM) prior to each
Wednesday evening's class at which point we will all discuss the readings.
The other two students will
serve as respondents to the papers, summarizing the main points of
the assigned paper and starting the general discussion. All the
other members of the class are required to bring discussion questions
to class based on their reading. I will collect these questions at
the beginning of class. The number of times that you will each be
assigned to write papers and serve as a respondent will depend on
the total number of students in the course, but, generally speaking,
you will likely be responsible for writing papers for two classes
and serving as a respondent for an additional two classes. During
the first class, we will assign responsibilities as well as grading
options for these papers. I will provide written feedback on all papers;
respondents will get a check+, check, or check- as a grade.
A final museum-design project (don't
worry - technical expertise not required). Proposal due April 2; Bibliography/resources
due April 23; Final project due by May 13, with possible extension
(with my approval) to May 15. No extensions beyond that date without
an official incomplete.
(4) Participation.
Class
participation is essential and will be reflected in your grade. I
understand that not everyone finds it as easy to participate actively,
but this is a small class with a lot of interesting things happening.
As very bright people, I'm confident that you'll all have wonderful
things to contribute to the course. If you feel that something is
preventing your full and eager participation in the course, please
see me and we will try to sort it out.
Presentations:
2 x 10% each
20%
Comments: 2 x 5% each
10%
Museum Critiques: 2
x 10% each
20%
Final Project
25%
Participation
25%
A
Note on the Readings:
All
books recommended for purchase should be available at the Oberlin College
bookstore (or through on-line booksellers). These books will also be
on reserve in the library. The other materials are collected into a
course pack which will be available for purchase through the History
Department. Two copies of the course pack will also be on reserve in
the library. Those articles in the course pack are noted with an * in
the syllabus. Furthermore, the articles in the course pack will also
be available on the Electronic
Reserve (ERes) system.
Museum
Sites on the Web
There
are probably thousands of museum sites on the web. I have listed a few
sites devoted to museum associations, meta-sites on museums, local area
museums, and a brief list of a few of my favorites. Feel free to give
me your own, and I'll add them. The listing is only available on the
on-line syllabus.
Books Recommended for Purchase:
Stephen T. Asma, Stuffed Animals
and Pickled Heads: The Culture and Evolution of Natural History Museums
(New York: Oxford University Press), April 2001.
Steven C. Dubin, Displays of Power: Controversy in the American Museum
from the Enola Gay to Sensation (New York: New York University Press),
Dec. 2000.
Ivan Karp and Steven D. Lavine, eds.,
Exhibiting Cultures. The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display
(Washington and London: Smithsonian Press), 1991.
Stephen E. Weil, Making Museums Matter
(Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press), 2002.
Lawrence Weschler, Mr. Wilson's Cabinet
of Wonder. Pronged Ants, Horned Humans, Mice on Toast, and Other Marvels
of Jurassic Technology (New York: Vintage Books), 1996.
February 5: "The Primary Function of Any Museum Is…"
Introduction. What is a Museum?
James A. Boon, "Why Museums Make
Me Sad," in Ivan Karp and Steven D. Lavine, eds., Exhibiting
Cultures. The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display (Washington
and London: Smithsonian Press, 1991), pp. 255-277. [NOTE: This is a
good essay to read both at the beginning and the ending of the course.
In its style, almost more than in its content, it mimics the museum
and the process of museum going. Read it first, without stopping to
"figure everything out." Then return to it at the end of the
course and see what you make of it.]
*Sharon Macdonald, "Introduction,"
in Theorizing Museums. Representing Identity and Diversity in a Changing
World, ed. Sharon Macdonald and Gordon Fyfe (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,
1996), pp. 1-18. [* means that the article is on Electronic Reserve
-- ERes]
*Carol Duncan, "The Art Museum
as Ritual," in Civilizing Rituals. Inside Public Art Museums
(London and NY: Routledge, 1995), pp. 7-20. [ERes]
*Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, "What
is a Museum?" in Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge (London
and New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 1-22. [ERes]
February 12: Wonderment and the Museum Purpose. Collections, Collecting,
Organizing.
*Jorge Luis Borges, "Tlön,
Uqbar, Orbis Tertius," in Collected Fictions, trans. Andrew Hurley
(New York: Penguin Books, 1998), pp. 68-81. [ERes]
Stephen Greenblatt, "Resonance and
Wonder," in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting Cultures,
pp. 42-56.
*Susan M. Pearce, "Collecting:
Shaping the World," in Museums, Objects, and Collections: A
Cultural Study (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian, 1992), pp. 68-88,
and "Museums, the Intellectual Rationale," (pp. 89-117). [ERes]
*D.H. Lawrence, "Things,"
The Complete Short Stories, Vol. III (London: Heinemann, 1955), pp.
844-853. [ERes]
Stephen T. Asma, Stuffed Animals and
Pickled Heads: The Culture and Evolution of Natural History Museums
(New York: Oxford University Press), 2001. (Begin)
February 19: Museums,
the Rise of Modernity, and the Creation of the Public Sphere
In this section we will explore
the relationship of the museum to modernity - in particular we want to
explore the relationship of museums to the notion of public space, both
its historical creation and its specific location in the late-18th and
19th century. We will focus on department stores, the press, fairs, and
circuses. We also want to examine the promise of museums as related to
their location in political modernity: democratic representation (both
in the museum and in terms of museum goers). The readings set these issues
out theoretically (Habermas) - and you are encouraged to read that first
- and historically (Wallach). Pearce explores the various impulses behind
collecting (leading to different types of museums or collections) and
offers a brief overview of the history of museum collections. Lawrence
is, well, fun.
*Jürgen Habermas, The Structural
Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois
Society, trans. Thomas Burger (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991 [1962]),
pp. 27-51, 57-67. [ERes]
Stephen T. Asma, Stuffed Animals and
Pickled Heads, (complete).
*Kevin Walsh, "The Idea of Modernity,"
The Representation of the Past: Museums and Heritage in the Post-Modern
World (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 7-38. [ERes]
Recommended: *Tony Bennett, "Museums
and Progress. Narrative, Ideology, Performance," in The Birth
of the Museum. History, Theory, Politics (London and NY: Routledge,
1995), pp. 177-209. [ERes]
Museum Visit:
Wednesday, Feb. 19: Natural
History Museum (Cleveland): Leave Oberlin approx.
5:30, dinner at "Mi Pueblo," then museum.
Virtual Visits:
Harrods.
The approach here is to look for similarities and differences
between the museum and the department store, two early public spaces.
Consider the interactions between spectacle, display, consumption, and
acquisition. You might be particularly interested in visiting the lingerie
department or ladies
accessories. If you were in London, I would have you visit the "Egyptian
Room." What is the department store "look" vs. the museum
"look," and what is the visitor's gaze at each?
February 26: Museum and Modernity
I: Museum Design - Ways of Narrating, Ways of Seeing
Two main issues need to be discussed in
this section, both of which build off the idea of the museum as a product
of modernity: (1) The idea of the museum as a narrative structure. (Roberts)
Much like a novel (itself a 19th century phenomenon) or a nation, the
museum is a narrative structure which is fundamentally implicated in interpretation.
(2) The design and space of the (modern) museum is bound up with its existence
as a public space. (Bennett) In that sense it is expected to be open to
publics at the same time that
it is concerned both with how the publics will behave in museums and how
they will use the museum. We will explore these issues in terms of the
design of the interior museum space (rather than its external architecture),
and as relates to the transmission of certain "privileged" forms
of knowledge, science (Macdonald)
*Lisa C. Roberts, From Knowledge to
Narrative. Educators and the Changing Museum (Washington and London:
Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997), pp. 56-67, 131-150. [ERes]
Svetlana Alpers, "The Museum as
a Way of Seeing," in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting Cultures,
pp. 25-32.
*Tony Bennett, "The Exhibitionary
Complex," in David Boswell and Jessica Evans, Representing the
Nation: A Reader. Histories, Heritage and Museums (London and New
York: Routledge, 1999), pp. 332-361. [First published in New Formations
4 (1988): 73-102][ERes]
*Susan M. Pearce, "Meaningful Exhibition:
Knowledge Displayed," in Museums, Objects, and Collections:
A Cultural Study (Washington, DC: Smithsonian, 1992), pp. 136-143.
[ERes]
*Sharon Macdonald, "Exhibitions
of Power and Powers of Exhibition. An Introduction to the Politics of
Display," in Sharon Macdonald, ed., The Politics of Display:
Museums, Sciences, Culture (London & NY: Routledge, 1998), pp.
1-17 (only). [ERes]
First Museum Critique Due March 5
(turn in during class)
March 5: Museums and
Modernity II: Museums and the Nation
*Carol Duncan and Alan Wallach, "The
Universal Survey Museum," Art History 3:4 (December 1980):
448-469. [ERes]
*Bluford Adams, "Barnum's Long
Arms: The American Museum," in E Pluribus Barnum: The Great
Showman & the Making of U.S. Popular Culture (Minneapolis and
London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), pp. 75-115. [ERes]
*Alan Wallach, "William Wilson
Corcoran's Failed National Gallery," Exhibiting Contradiction:
Essays on the Art Museum in the United States (Amherst: University
of Massachusetts Press, 1998), pp. 22-37. [ERes]
Again, hundreds of possibilities. Consider
those particular museum sites that carry the burden of delivering a
national message, either in the direct sense (e.g. the National
Museum of American History), as a showcase of the nation (the "universal
survey museum", of which the Louvre
is the first), or attempt to influence the discourse as to what values
should be represented in the national past/present (e.g. the National
Civil Rights Museum). Others:
We have defined three broad purposes for
the museum (used here in its widest context): (1) education; (2) aesthetic/visual
enjoyment and pleasure; and (3) entertainment. In its modern context,
the vast majority of museums see their primary task as educational. This
week we will explore questions of learning theory and how new theories
of learning have impacted the design of museums.
*Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, "Learning
from Learning Theory in Museums," The Educational Role of the
Museum, ed. Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, 2nd ed. (London and New York:
Routledge, 1999), pp. 137-145. [ERes]
*George E. Hein, "Educational Theory," in Learning in the
Museum (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), pp. 14-40. [ERes]
*Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Kim Hermanson,
"Intrinsic Motivation in Museums: Why Does One Want to Learn?"
in Hooper-Greenhill, The Educational Role of the Museum, pp.
146-160. [ERes]
*Helen Coxall, "Museum Text as
Mediated Message," in Hooper-Greenhill, The Educational Role
of the Museum, pp. 215-222. [ERes]
*Kirsten M. Ellenbogen, "Museums
in Family Life: An Ethnographic Case Study," in Gaea Leinhardt,
Kevin Crowley, and Karen Knutson, eds., Learning Conversations in
Museums (Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002),
pp. 81-101. [ERes]
Other resources:
John H. Falk and Lynn D. Dierking,
Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning
(Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press), 2000.
Gaea Leinhardt, Kevin Crowley, and Karen
Knutson, eds., Learning Conversations in Museums (Mahwah, NJ
and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 2002.
Eilean Hooper-Greenhill, Museums
and Their Visitors (London: Routledge), 1994.
Baseball centers around
the (seemingly) eternal struggle between pitcher and batter, and
each uses physics, albeit intuitively, to gain a slim advantage
over the other in determining the fate of the game's center of
interest -- the ball.
(From a current exhibit at the
Exploratorium on the
physics of baseball)
March 19: Material Culture
and the Production of Historical Narratives. Artifacts, Authenticity,
Truth
A particular modernist assumption is that
museums, by providing their visitors with the artifact, present them not
just with "the real thing," but with the truth. Thus, the museum
is about "truthful"objects and "accurate" messages.
Weschler, and David Wilson, remind us that museums do not always serve
these purposes… or do they? Wallach notes that authenticity and originality
are not always the same thing.
Lawrence Weschler, Mr. Wilson's Cabinet
of Wonder. Pronged Ants, Horned Humans, Mice on Toast, and Other Marvels
of Jurassic Technology (New York: Pantheon), 1995.
*Alan Wallach, "The American Cast
Museum: An Episode in the History of the Institutional Definition of
Art," in Exhibiting Contradiction. Essays on the Art Museum in
the United States, pp. 38-56. [ERes]
Spencer R. Crew and James E. Sims, "Locating
Authenticity: Fragments of a Dialogue," in Karp and Lavine, eds.,
Exhibiting Cultures, pp. 159-175.
NOTE: For those intrigued by the Museum
of Jurassic Technology, the MJT has just published its own "Jubilee
Catalog," The Museum of Jurassic Technology, listed as authored
by "The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Information" in
2002. The slim book describes (but doesn't analyze) the exhibits in
the museum. This is not the "real" story of the museum (which
is encountered in Weschler), but the museum's own presentation.
Recommended: *Susan A. Crane, "Curious
Cabinets and Imaginary Museums," in Museums and Memory,
Susan A. Crane, ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000), pp.
60-80 and The Museum of Jurassic Technology, "Geoffrey Sonnabend:
Obliscence: Theories of Forgetting and the Problem of Matter: An Encapsulation
by Valentine Worth," in Crane, ed., Museums and Memory,
pp. 81-90. [ERes]
Miles Orvell, The Real Thing : Imitation
and Authenticity in American culture, 1880-1940 (Chapel Hill : University
of North Carolina Press), 1989.
No Museum Visit Scheduled: Try
to visit museums over spring break!
In general, the objects preserved in museums
are solid (i.e., three dimensional) and originate in the past, so that
the observer experiencing them in three-dimensional space must somehow
also cross a temporal barrier. In this sense alone, then, museums are
not the same as, say, illustrated books. But if we recognize this difference,
we also need to raise some basic questions about how museums (fundamentally
non-art museums, in this context) work. The questions we confront have
to do with what is "real," what is "authentic" (and,
in that sense, we can also be dealing with art and the question of forgeries),
and how we relate to "old" three-dimensional objects. Do objects
have meaning sui generis? What role do museums have in terms of mediating
experiences? In this week, we the explore the relationship of material
culture (the artifact) to "truth," "reality," or "authenticity,"
and the specific set of questions which are raised for institutions which
choose to preserve and promote material culture.
The readings all involve objects (artifacts)
and their meanings - the relationship between artifact and meaning. Radley
treats the way in which we perceive objects in a social psychological
way. Both Crew and Sims and Pearce, on the other hand, suggest how historical
study gives meaning to material culture and how our possession of objects
for the human past influences the way in which we understand the past.
The Mamet script is a playful approach to all the questions of "reality"
within a museum context.
*Susan M. Pearce, "Meaning in History,"
in Museum, Object, and Collection: A Cultural Study (Washington,
DC: Smithsonian, 1992), pp. 192-209. [ERes]
*John Urry, "How Societies Remember
the Past," in Theorizing Museums. Representing Identity and
Diversity in a Changing World, Macdonald and Fyfe, eds., pp. 45-65.
[ERes]
*Alan Radley, "Boredom, Fascination
and Mortality: Reflections Upon the Experience of Museum Visiting,"
in Gaynor Kavanagh, ed., Museum Languages: Objects and Texts (Leicester,
London and NY: Leicester University Press, 1991), pp. 65-82. [ERes]
*Roberts, From Knowledge to Narrative,
pp. 88-103. [ERes]
*David Mamet, "The Museum of Science
and Industry Story," in Five Television Plays (New York
Grove Weidenfeld, 1990), pp. 91-125. [ERes]
*Gaynor Kavanagh, "Dream Spaces,
Memories and Museums," in Dream Spaces: Memory and Museum
(London & New York: Leicester University Press, 2000), pp. 1-8.
[ERes]
*Raphael Samuel, "Preface: Memory
Work," and "Unofficial Knowledge," in Theatres of
Memory (London: Verso, 1994), pp. vii-xiii; 3-48. [ERes]
*David Glassberg, "Public History
and the Study of Memory," The Public Historian 18: 2 (Spring
1996), pp. 7-22. [ERes]
*"Roundtable: Responses to David
Glassberg's 'Public History and the Study of Memory,'" with responses
by David Lowenthal, Edward T. Linenthal, Michael Kammen, Linda Shopes,
Jo Blatti, Robert R. Archibald, Barbara Franco, and David Glassberg,
The Public Historian 19:2 (Spring 1997), pp. 30-72. [ERes]
Museum Visit (Tentative):
April 5: Youngstown Historical Center
of Industry & Labor
Second Museum Critique
Due April 9 (turn in during class)
April 9: Culture Wars.
The Battle to Shape Social Memory
The authority of museums to create interpretations
is challenged today as never before both by the visiting public and museum
professionals. Because museums are central public institutions that mediate
culture for growing numbers of people, they have become ground zero of
"culture wars" in many countries, particularly the United States
and, to a certain extent, Britain. Museum curators, museologists, and
students of museum practice now read the names of specific exhibits as
if they were battles sites from major wars: Harlem on My Mind (Metropolitan
Museum of Art, 1969), The West as America: Reinterpreting Images of
the Frontier, 1820-1920 (National Museum
of American Art, 1991); Sigmund Freud: Conflict and Culture (Library
of Congress, 1998), Birth and Breeding: the Politics of Reproduction
in Modern Britain (Wellcome Institute,
1993-4). For most observers, the most impressive battle of this war
was the Enola Gay exhibit (originally titled The Crossroads: The End of
World War II, the Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War) that was
to open at the Smithsonian's National
Air and Space Museum in the mid-1990s. All our readings this week
concern this exhibit, and we will want to examine a number of issues.
Why are museums becoming such critical spaces for "culture wars"?
The museum's obligations of interpretation or, as one curator puts it:
"Why not take sides? Why not be partial? How can we possibly understand
the issues involved, when the whole point of history is being systematically
denied?" A reasonable assessment, but how does this play out at publicly
funded museums, particularly those thought to be representative of the
"nation" as a whole? How can museum curators prepare their defenses
for seemingly inevitable attacks?
*Roberts, From Knowledge to Narrative,
pp. 72-79. [ERes]
Steven C. Dubin, Displays of Power:
Controversy in the American Museum from the Enola Gay to Sensation
(New York: New York University Press, 2000), Chapters 1, 5, 6. Then pick
either 2, 3, or 4. (Or, feel free to read the entire book!)
For a spectacular web site on the Enola
Gay controversy, consult Edward J. Gallagher, Lehigh University: http://www.lehigh.edu/~ineng/enola/
Here we look at the importance of the museum
in its binary creation of the Other. The question to be examined is how
a particular artifact/people/culture/time becomes available to an unfamiliar
people. The exoticization of the unfamiliar (i.e., its separation from
a presumed familiar) is often mediated by specific ideological institutions
among which museums are central. Dias' focuses on the process of constituting
racial difference, arguing that it is associated with the ways in which
race is visualized and suggesting that anthropological collections and
museums were important "systems of evidence" in the conceptualization
of racial difference. An important issue here is the fact that this process
seems to be accomplished by liberals and social reformers, not reactionaries,
and that we must be aware of the museum as a "democratic" space,
open to the public, when we understand the ideological role which it played
in the 19th century (and now).
*Tracy Lang Teslow, "Reifying Race:
Science and Race at the Field Museum of Natural History," in MacDonald,
ed., The Politics of Display, pp. 53-76. [ERes]
Various articles from Karp and Lavine,
eds., Exhibiting Cultures, including: Michael Baxandall, "Exhibiting
Intention: Some Preconditions of the Visual Display of Culturally Purposeful
Objects," in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting Cultures, pp. 33-41.
*Stephen Jay Gould, "The Hottentot
Venus", in The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History
(NY: W.W. Norton & Co, 1985), pp. 291-301. [ERes]
Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, "Objects
of Ethnography," in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting Cultures,
pp. 386-416 (only).
*Paul Greenhalgh, "Human Showcases,"
Ephemeral Vistas: The Expositions Universelles, Great Exhibitions and
World's Fairs, 1851-1939 (Manchester: Manchester University Press,
1988), pp. 82-111. [ERes]
No Museum Visit
Virtual Visits:
Mutter
Museum (You might want to visit the exhibit on "The Social
History of Conjoined Twins")
Famous
Freaks (A web site with no pretense of being a museum, nonetheless
suggests that "freaks" are still an object of the museum gaze)
Optional Readings for April 30 and May
7: We have focused almost exclusively on the historic museum, particularly
in the 19th century, the moment of its greatest impact and importance.
At one level, it is not hard to critique museums and museum practices
in the way in which they solidify discourses about difference, hierarchy,
and power. But the museum (or theme park or heritage site, etc.) remains
an important, even vibrant institution which can offer its visitors new
insights and which can destabilize the very discourses that museums have
created in the past. The articles this week offer suggestions, from the
curators' viewpoint, as to how this can be accomplished. Gurian wonders
how best to design exhibits that can help people learn and realizes that
curators must work against the discipline that has taught them what "appropriate
behavior" in museums is. Vogel argues that museums always "recontextualize
and interpret objects," and one should not apologize for this. Rather,
by discussing specific exhibits, she suggests how curators must be "self-aware
and open about the degree of subjectivity" in their collections.
Using a somewhat thicker theoretical approach, Porter explores the ways
in which museums constitute masculine and feminine and then describes
a series of contemporary exhibits in Britain and northern Europe that
challenge conventional readings. And Jones suggests how exhibitionary
practices can rework the British colonial legacy. The exhibits discussed
in these articles are just a few of many (see the optional reading for
this week for more) which have been mounted in the past decade that suggest
that the museum and its related exhibitionary institutions remain very
much engaged in a struggle over how knowledge is to be shaped.
Elaine Heumann Gurian, "Noodling Around with Exhibition Opportunities,"
in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting Cultures, pp. 176-190.
Susan Vogel, "Always True to the
Object, in Our Fashion," in Karp and Lavine, eds., Exhibiting
Cultures, pp. 191-204.
*Ivan Karp, Christine Mullen Kreamer,
and Steven D. Lavine, eds., Museums and Communities. The Politics of
Public Culture (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press), 1992.
See, in particular, Jane Peirson Jones, "The Colonial Legacy and
the Community: The Gallery 33 Project," pp. 221-241. [ERes]