The FSA
photographers covered a wide range of subjects in their work, venturing
way beyond the institutional need for photographs demonstrating the indignity
of migrant living conditions and the effectiveness of FSA programs. Historians
of the FSA differ radically in the extent to which they see the body of
FSA work as a creative chaos, a democratic melange of mininarratives and
portraits, or instead trace the development of a coherent metanarrative
or an overarching ideological agenda. At the core of divergent interpretations
is the question of whether the FSA agenda had emerged, either intentionally
or unconsciously, from the functioning of the project; that is, to what
extent had the narrative structure of the project been predetermined.
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juliet Gorman, May 2001
|
|
|