COMMENTARY

E D I T O R I A L S:

Changing the world in 1886

Imagine your favorite professor giving a lecture directed at the importance of finding a specific solution, a solution to a problem that would undeniably make life better. Not too hard to imagine, is it? What if that professor directly challenged your class to find this world-changing solution? Little bit harder to imagine, hunh? Okay, here's the hard part: What if you took the professor's challenge to heart, branched out, did the needed research and found a solution to that problem? Now imagine doing all that as an Oberlin student. You imagining it? It's almost unimaginable in our day and time, but what you're imagining are the 111 year-old exploits of Obie Charles Martin Hall and his teacher, Frank Fanning Jewett.

In 1886, an Oberlin student named Charles Martin Hall changed the chemical world forever by extracting aluminum from ore. This isn't some he-did-it-so-you-can-too rant. Of course there were many structural differences between Hall's time and ours. But the impetus for Hall's discovery is one which transcends time: within college environments, it often takes productive and sometimes rigorous teacher/student relationships to change the world. Hall could not have discovered what he did, had the seed of discovery not been planted by Jewett. But seeds don't grow by themselves. They need willing soil and water. Hall wasn't the only student in the class to hear the lecture, yet he was the only one to push on and realize the dream of his professor.

Two days ago, Oberlin became a Chemical Landmark because of Hall's achievement. And at the base of this intricate chemical development was the simplicity of a wonderful working relationship between Charles Martin Hall, a student and Frank Fanning Jewett, a teacher.


ExCo doesn't need further regulation

ExCo is one of the more celebrated aspects of Oberlin's curriculum for good reason. Most undergraduate colleges don't have such a unique and student-centered program to enrich and vary student's schedules.

ExCo also seems to miraculously rise from near-shambles every semester; a handful of dedicated and overworked students organize and administer the entire program.

The recent cancellation of two ExCos that allegedly involved inappropriate interactions between the instructor and his students has raised some concerns about the administration and oversight of ExCos.

Some say that the ExCo committee needs to be more responsible. This reaction is misguided, however. While it is always easy to harp on the need for added regulation, paperwork, bureaucracy and official accountability, these types of systems rarely work. The only real regulation comes from people's own respect for the integrity of ExCo. Instead of more regulation, ExCo needs mature and responsible students and instructors who respect the freedom that ExCo gives them.

It is difficult to assign blame in the situation that ExCo is currently dealing with. ExCo requires both responsible instructors and students; not more internal bureaucracy or involvement of the Administration.


Editorials in this box are the responsibility of the editor-in-chief, managing editor and commentary editor, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the Review.

Back // Commentary Contents \\ Next

T H E   O B E R L I N   R E V I E W

Copyright © 1997, The Oberlin Review.
Volume 126, Number 3, September 19, 1997

Contact us with your comments and suggestions.