SFC
Article Not Balanced
To
the Editors:
As
both a member of the Student Finance Committee and a student who
is feverishly committed to protecting the rights of students against
any impending barrage of administrative shadiness, I was both disappointed
and distressed by the article which appeared, or rather, didnt
appear in last weeks issue of the Review. In case you missed
it: four paragraphs which scathingly portrayed the SFC as a group
of money hording bastards who chuckle at the notion that students
should be able to spend money on the things that students like to
do. The information printed in the article was unbalanced and oversimplified.
The coverage of the near half-million-dollar disbursement of the
student activity fee was summed up in less space than your average
Review comic and in one-fourth of the space that was devoted to
chalking sidewalks two weeks ago.
The SFC article quoted a disgruntled Oberlin Film Series co-chair
complaining that they could only show 65 of the 85 requested films.
What the article didnt quote was the number of students who
have left their rooms to tromp down to see an advertised OFS film
only to find the door locked and no indication that anything was
ever scheduled, except for the 50 students milling about wondering
if theyve got their days mixed up. What the article didnt
quote was that the OFS arbitrarily decided to pay its chair. Do
class presidents get paid? No. Do members of SFC get paid? No. Do
EXCO teachers get paid? No. Do OFS chairs get paid? Um. No.
Oberlin Action Against Prisons was upset that they werent
allocated $12,000 to bring Angela Davis to Oberlin. And rightly
so. Im upset that my class council couldnt get the whole
half a million to have Sarah McLachlan and Dido perform a duet while
mud wrestling naked in Wilder Main. Its not that SFC doesnt
value the OAAP conference or their drive to bring an activist to
this campus. Its that SFC does not have the means to pay anyone
$12,000 for a single speaking engagement. And when you consider
that 12K amounts to $4 per Obie, the decision becomes even more
clear. If given the option, would every Obie pay $4 to hear Angela
Davis speak? And the list goes on.
I could defend every single line of every single budget Ive
considered. And even budgets that I havent. Show me a copy
of any budget thats ever been reviewed by the SFC and I can
probably explain exactly why things have been rejected or removed.
Contrary to popular belief, allocations by the SFC are not arbitrary.
They are in fact, relatively standard. Hence the Standard
Allocations sheet which all treasurers get. If they bother
to read it, they can see that SFC only provides 35% of the cost
of a speaker up to $535. When organizations ignore that information,
they are bound to be disappointed. If they hold that sheet up to
the budget theyve just gotten back, covered in red ink, theyll
begin to see some method to the madness.
Allocations are also not biased. Nor are they fun. There is perhaps
nothing more tedious than facing a group of your friends and telling
them that you can barely give them a third of the money theyve
requested. Do we make judgement calls about the events organizations
are planning to throw? No. Do we underfund events because we dont
plan to go to them and are relatively sure no one else will? No.
Thats not our job.
Our job is to make the $170 student activity fee each student pays
go as far as humanly possible. With that in mind, you can be upset
that SFC wouldnt give you the money to buy your organization
an iBook. Or you can acknowledge that maybe you just thought it
would be cool to have a free iBook that you as an organizational
liaison could play with. And maybe you could further acknowledge
that other student organizations have goals as lofty and worthwhile
as your own. And that sometimes you have to share, even when it
means giving up something you really really want.
Chris
Anton
College senior
|