Dye,
Professors Condemn Bush’s War on Terror
By
John Byrne
College
President Nancy Dye and various professors offered a scathing critique
of the Bush Administration’s approach to terrorism at Saturday’s
All-Community Teach-In.
The teach-in, held Saturday morning at 9:30 a.m. drew about 200
people, including many from the greater Oberlin community. It broached
such issues as academic and personal freedom in an age of heightened
surveillance, Israel, Palestine, Muslims, “the other”
and foreign policy.
In her introductory remarks, Dye spoke of how her outlook on the
world has changed since 9/11.
“I find myself thinking about why it is we have colleges and
universities, and what role they have to play,” she said.
“The ignorance of nations, and of each of us, can contribute
to disaster.”
The boundaries of the modern Middle East can be traced to the 1919
Treaty of Versailles, Dye stated. Statesmen at Versailles divvied
up the colonial spoils of the Arab nations.
“It was at the Paris Peace Conference that the modern Middle
East was created,” she said.
Dye also asserted that British policymakers believed that the Jews
were behind an array of despicable activities, including the financial
backing of the Bolsheviks in the Russian Revolution.
Today, we again exhibit such gross ignorance, she said.
“Remarkable, we say now, how incredibly ignorant people can
be,” she remarked. “But we have to ask ourselves —
what do we know, and are we really that different?”
She also expressed frustration with the government’s new powers
of surveillance, and the stifling effect such surveillance can have
on the often controversial discussions that are sheltered and encouraged
by the umbrella of higher education.
“As Oberlin’s President, my first job is to protect
this College as a free and open space,” she said.
After Congressman Brown’s speech, community members broke
off into groups to discuss various specialized topics.
Associate Politics Professor Eve Sandberg and Dean of the College
Clayton Koppes hosted a session on U.S. foreign and military policy.
Sandberg posited that Bush’s policy of unilateralism was in
part predicated on the principle that the U.S. military has little
use for others’ involvement.
Noting that European allies have been cutting defense spending,
Sandberg said, “The Bush Administration has then said we’re
going it alone because you don’t have anything we need.”
Koppes reflected on the use of historical motifs in Bush’s
speeches, specifically in terms of Hitler and the League of Nations.
Bush, he said, has used veiled references to the failure of the
League of Nations to stop Hitler’s advances in Europe as metaphors
for the failure of the United Nations to stop Saddam Hussein.
“This is not new,” Koppes said. “The Hitler motif
has been used a lot. It was a quiet motif, with a slightly different
skew, in Vietnam.”
“It’s very seductive, and very slippery,” he added.
Koppes also spoke briefly about the role of oil in any Iraq war.
Iraq, he said, has the ability to produce seven million gallons
of oil per day, but is currently only pumping 1 million gallons.
They’re sitting on massive reserves, he said.
“One thing this would do is stave off an increase in oil prices,
which would have a distinct economic benefit,” Koppes said.
“It would enable us to press the Saudis,” he added.
Politics Professor Ben Schiff and Assistant Professor of Women’s
Studies Francis Hasso discussed the role of Israel and Palestine,
and the dearth of strong leadership in the region.
“The feeling of relative hopelessness with leadership has
been a
constant since the 1970’s,” Schiff said.
They also discussed the role of collaborators, who in the end are
alienated from both groups.
Dye and Politics Professor Ronald Kahn held a session on academic
freedom and civil liberties. Kahn suggested that giving the Central
Intelligence Agency greater clandestine powers could make them a
quasi-military operation.
“The real problem in the future is what I call the incorporation
of civil-run agencies that are really quasi-military,” he
said.
Other groups highlighted in the sessions were Arabs, Muslims and
“others,” in a workshop offered by Assistant Professor
of Religion Anna Gade and a leader from an Arab Community Center
in Michigan, Karen Rigall. Arab Americans have become unfortunate
targets of the war on terror, they said.
In an inteview with the Review, Dye expressed her personal fears
about waging war with Iraq.
“I am more scared about the idea ... of the U.S. launching
a preemptive attack on Iraq than I have ever been scared of anything
as an American,” she said.
“It seems an incredibly ill-thought out and dangerous thing
to do,” she added. “What’s the hurry? Why the
rush to mix it up?”
|